Tuesday 30 December 2014

From the UN Monitoring group Report: Diaspora taxes and remittances 2011

From the UN Monitoring group Report: Diaspora taxes and remittances

Posted at FB July 2011

D. Diaspora taxes and remittances
381. Probably the most significant source of revenue for PFDJ is the excise of a 2 per cent income tax on Eritrean nationals living abroad.318 An estimated 1.2 million Eritreans — or 25 per cent of the total population — live in the diaspora,319 with the most important concentrations in North America, Europe and the Middle East. According to estimates by various national law enforcement officers, Eritrean eyewitnesses and former Eritrean Government agents in the diaspora, the Government of Eritrea is estimated to raise tens — and possibly hundreds — of millions of dollars on an annual basis.
382. Justifications for the tax vary. A senior Eritrean official described it to the
Monitoring Group as a land tax for expatriate Eritreans or dual nationals who own
land or property in their homeland.320 Numerous Eritrean expatriates in different
countries have described it to the Monitoring Group as a “consular service”. For
example, any Eritrean citizen seeking to renew a passport or Eritrean holders of
foreign passports requesting a visa to visit Eritrea must produce documentation of
their tax payments in their host country.321 On this basis, the 2 per cent tax is
calculated and the individual is obliged to make payment, in the form of cheque or
money order, into an account controlled by the local Eritrean embassy. Individuals
who have not required “consular services” for several years are nevertheless
required to pay “arrears” for years in which the tax was not paid.

383. Those unwilling to pay these taxes may have entry rights into Eritrea denied,
property in Eritrea seized or family members in Eritrea harassed. In cases where
host country documentation is considered to be unreliable, unofficial Eritrean
embassy or party officials may monitor the activities of the Eritrean diaspora
communities in order to assess their income and degree of compliance.

384. Monitoring Group interviews with former PFDJ and Government of Eritrea
finance officials indicate that these hard currency deposits are managed by PFDJ,
under the direction of Hagos Gebrehiwot, and not through State institutions such as
the Bank of Eritrea, the Commercial Bank of Eritrea, the Ministry of Finance or the
Treasury. Taxes collected this way are remitted to the accounts of different Eritrean
embassies abroad and thereafter transferred from embassy account to embassy
__________________
account, depending on operational needs, or transferred to privately held offshore
accounts.

385. The PFDJ Economic Affairs Department also controls millions of dollars in
hard currency in the form of remittances deposited by members of the Eritrean
diaspora sending money home to family and friends in Eritrea. Remittance deposits
are made through Himbol, a PFDJ-controlled wire transfer company that maintains
offices — both official and unofficial — at Eritrean embassies and community
centres abroad, and which uses international wire agencies as agents to affect
transfers.

386. Hard currency remittances accumulate in Himbol and embassy bank accounts
outside Eritrea, while recipients in Eritrea receive disbursements in local nakfa
currency. Since Himbol is a PFDJ-owned company, the hard currency deposits
abroad can be managed by the Economic Affairs Department of PFDJ as it sees fit.
As with taxation receipts collected in embassy accounts, this money is either
transferred to PFDJ-controlled accounts held in correspondent banks, moved to
(official or unofficial) embassy accounts, or disbursed as cash for transfer in
diplomatic pouch by Eritrean “diplomatic” couriers.

387. Although Eritrea is not alone in imposing extraterritorial tax obligations on its
citizens, there are some unique aspects of the manner in which this policy is
implemented. First, the tax may be applied to foreign nationals of Eritrean origin,
regardless of whether they maintain dual nationality. The tax is routinely collected
by diplomats at Eritrean missions abroad, a practice that arguably violates the
Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. In locations where Eritrea lacks
diplomatic or consular representation, the tax is often collected informally by party
agents or community activists whose activities may, in some jurisdictions, be
considered a form of extortion.


No comments:

Post a Comment